12/21/23 - "The United States and Israel Stand Alone": The World Demands a Ceasefire as the death toll in Gaza approaches 20,000.

The United Nations Security Council's Inaction

The United Nations Security Council has encountered persistent setbacks in its efforts to vote on a resolution urging an immediate cessation of hostilities in Gaza, as well as urging Israel to permit the entry of essential supplies such as food, water, fuel, and medicine into the embattled region. Security Council Members Express Frustration with US Overvote Delays and Veto Threats Several members of the United Nations Security Council have voiced their frustration towards the United States for its repeated delays in voting on resolutions and its threats to veto any proposed measures. Concerns have been raised about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza due to the lack of progress in reaching a resolution.

A Historical Pattern of US Refusal

In a development that comes as no surprise, the current situation bears a striking resemblance to previous occurrences. The United States' consistent stance of declining internationally urged ceasefires during Israeli offensives, particularly in Gaza, has been a recurring aspect of its historical record. In a recurring occurrence, this observed pattern of behaviour is currently being witnessed once more. In a recent development, the United States has reportedly declined the usage of the terms "cessation of hostilities" or "ceasefire." This decision by the US authorities has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions within the international community. In a notable shift of rhetoric, the parties involved have chosen to discuss a "suspension of hostilities," a term that suggests a momentary cessation of the ongoing violence. Israel's ongoing military operations in Gaza have led to the unfortunate loss of numerous Palestinian lives, with casualties reaching a significant number.

The focus now lies on whether fellow members of the Security Council can exert their influence to sway the United States into altering its stance, thereby facilitating a genuine cessation of hostilities or a ceasefire. The probability of this occurrence remains uncertain. The United States' stance on a potential ceasefire is currently under scrutiny, prompting deliberations within the Security Council. The Council faces the pivotal decision of either compelling the US to exercise its veto power or opting to withdraw the resolution altogether. In a move with far-reaching implications, the decision to withdraw the resolution carries substantial consequences. By opting to withdraw, the United States would effectively absolve itself of any responsibility while simultaneously highlighting its isolation on the global stage should it choose to exercise its veto power.

The Power of the General Assembly

In the event of a potential veto on the Security Council resolution, the matter would be escalated to the General Assembly, in accordance with the well-established tradition of fostering unity for the cause of peace. In a noteworthy development, the General Assembly has demonstrated its increasing influence by utilising the authority of Security Council vetoes. In a significant development, the General Assembly's votes, although lacking legal authority, have gained substantial influence when they coincide with a Security Council veto. The United States' reluctance to utilise its veto power whenever possible is driven by strategic considerations. In a remarkable demonstration of their isolation, a recent development has brought attention to the widespread agreement worldwide in support of a ceasefire in Gaza. In a remarkable development, it has come to light that certain nations find themselves in an isolated position. This revelation not only highlights their unique stance but also serves as a powerful testament to the widespread support for the cessation of hostilities in the region.

The Influence of US Support for Israel

In the midst of the persistent violence and dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the United States remains steadfast in its unwavering support for Israel. Israeli Foreign Minister Responds Firmly to President Biden's Criticism In a swift and resolute response to President Biden's recent remarks regarding Israel's indiscriminate bombardment, the Israeli Foreign Minister wasted no time in asserting the nation's commitment to its ongoing actions, regardless of international support. President Biden's comments, which were characterised as a light criticism of Israel's military operations, prompted a swift reaction from the Israeli Foreign Minister. Undeterred by the President's stance, the Foreign Minister made it clear that Israel would persist with its actions, regardless of the level of international backing. The exchange between President Biden and the Israeli Foreign Minister highlights the differing perspectives on Israel's military operations. While the President's remarks were seen as a mild reproach, the Israeli government remains resolute in its determination to continue its actions, emphasising its self-reliance in the face of international opinion. This response underscores the ongoing tensions surrounding Israel's military campaign and the complex dynamics at play in the region. As the situation continues to evolve, the international community will closely monitor the actions and statements of both President Biden and the Israeli government, as they navigate this delicate and contentious issue. US Support for Israel Remains Unwavering Amid Global Criticism The United States' commitment to supporting Israel remains resolute, undeterred by the mounting international outcry.

The United States has issued diplomatic appeals to the Israeli government, urging them to minimise civilian casualties and modify their operational strategies. Despite numerous requests, there have been no discernible consequences or alterations in behaviour. Israel remains unfazed by external pressure, particularly from the United States, as long as the latter fails to convey its demands with a sense of gravity. US Urged to Impose Requirements and Conditions on Israel to Ensure Significant Impact In order to exert a substantial influence on Israel, experts are calling on the United States to adopt a more assertive approach by making its requests to the Middle Eastern nation as requirements and attaching specific conditions. This strategic move is believed to be crucial in shaping the bilateral relationship between the two countries and achieving desired outcomes. The suggestion to impose requirements and conditions on Israel comes at a time when the US administration is seeking to strengthen its influence in the region and address various issues of mutual concern. By transforming requests into firm requirements, the United States aims to underscore the significance of its expectations and ensure that they are met with due diligence. Experts argue that attaching specific conditions to these requirements would further enhance the effectiveness of US demands. The potential measures being considered encompass a reduction in military assistance and a withdrawal of support for the International Criminal Court.

Focusing on the Victims

Secretary of State Tony Blinken's recent comments divert attention from the root causes of the conflict and the suffering of the Palestinian people. Blinken's focus on demands made of Hamas while ignoring the aggressor's actions is misleading. Israel's ongoing war against Gaza has resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians, including women and children. The United States' backing of Israel's actions has enabled the Israeli government to impose a 17-year-long siege on Gaza, leading to starvation and a humanitarian catastrophe.

The Urgency for a Ceasefire

The need for a ceasefire is urgent. The current situation in Gaza is unprecedented, with more than half of families experiencing starvation and 90% facing food insecurity. The United Nations World Food Program has highlighted the severity of the crisis, emphasizing that 20% of all children in Gaza are stunted due to a lack of sufficient food. The international community must act swiftly to bring an end to the suffering and starvation in Gaza.

Public Opinion and the Biden Administration

A recent poll by The New York Times and Sienna College revealed that the majority of Americans oppose the Biden administration's policy on the conflict. However, some respondents indicated that they would vote for Trump in the 2024 election. The reasons behind this response are unclear, but what is evident is the widespread opposition within the United States to the current approach. This includes opposition within the State Department and even among White House interns, who have publicly condemned the US support for Israeli war crimes.

It is crucial for the Biden administration to listen to the American people and reassess its stance on the conflict. The overwhelming demand for a ceasefire should guide their actions and prompt a shift towards a more balanced and just approach.

The situation in Gaza demands immediate attention and action. The international community, including the United States, must prioritise the lives and well-being of the Palestinian people and work towards a sustainable and lasting solution. Only through diplomacy, respect for international law, and a genuine commitment to peace can we hope to end the violence and bring about a brighter future for all.